I'm surprised, actually. They're pretty heavy. Apparently, they are quite aerodynamic, too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ffd2/5ffd29ef7e26eee84fa2c00f8f142245c83f88d8" alt=""
Just testing if I can actually post to the blog from work, when I can’t actually access the webpage. Theoretically, this should world.
Lovely weekend – very busy. We went to see ‘Into the Woods’ at the Longmont Theater on Friday night. I love musicals, the Adorable Husband humors me. It’s a small local theater, and the show was very good. We also saw X-Men 3 in the afternoon – lots of fun.
Saturday we had our friends over for fondue again…and we were all lounging around the table, drinking wine, and realized it was 2am. I’m getting way too old for that sort of nonsense. At least it was a holiday weekend, so we could sleep in (and sleep in we did – ‘til nearly eleven!). Great food, a few spirited arguments about religion and politics. We always enjoy having them over.
Yesterday we wandered the Boulder Creek Arts Festival and post-BolderBoulder party and saw the a capella group <a href=”www.faceonline.biz”>Face</a> (which was founded by a family friend). Absolutely phenomenal concert – seven men, no instruments. I’m still trying to figure out how the “rhythm section” guy was able to make all those sounds only with his voice.
So here goes – emailing the blog entry….
"[The trustee] came expecting to get a check and made clear it was to clear legal fees," says Scott Charton, director of university communications. The meeting was fairly tempestuous, involving threats of litigation. In any case, according to a statement Missouri released on Monday, the university’s general counsel concluded, after talking to the state attorney general, that there were "legal questions" concerning the propriety of returning the funds. The Missouri constitution doesn't allow public funds to be given to private concerns — either to Lay or his charities.Tacky, eh? I suppose it would have been helpful, now that he's been found guilty on all counts.
DAWN KOPECKI: The President just delegated authority to John Negroponte that allows him to exempt any publicly traded corporation that is working on national defense issues or national security issues from the reporting and accounting requirements under the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act. It's basically the rules and regulations that require companies to keep accurate records, acurate books, accurate accounting . . . and then disclose those projects and that information to investors.Yeah. I feel safer. Lots safer. What about you?
RYSSDAL: The memo that the President signed was dated May 5. Talk to me about the timing of this for a second.
KOPECKI: Well, May 5 is the day that Porter Goss stepped down from the CIA. It's also six days before USA Today published its story that three major telephone companies had turned over massive amounts of customer calling records to the federal government, that the NSA was using to data-mine and look for patterns and, basically, spy on.
RYSSDAL: Now, if you play this out, conceivably what this rule now means is that AT&T and Bell South and Verizon, who have these government contracts — it's been reported in the papers — have these government contracts to sell customer data to the government, they may never have to report that income or how the finances of that program worked.
So, how much does this really help the "middle class"? It's surprising how many people think that the tax cuts are really helping the little guy. The truth is, it's aimed directly at those in the top 5% or so. Here's how much you might actually benefit from this:House and Senate Republican negotiators reached a final agreement yesterday
on a five-year, nearly $70 billion tax package that would extend President
Bush's deep cuts to tax rates on dividends and capital gains, while sparing
about 15 million middle-income Americans from the alternative minimum
tax
Income, in 2005 dollars Average tax saving
$10,000-20,000 $2
$20,000-30,000 9
$30,000-40,000 16
$40,000-50,000 46
$50,000-75,000 110
$75,000-100,000 403
$100,000-200,000 1,388
$200,000-500,000 4,499
$500,000-1 million 5,562
More than $1 mil 41,977SOURCE: Tax Policy Center
At any rate, they should start mudding tomorrow, adn I think by the end of the week they'll have the texture done. Whoohoo!
I'm off to Cheyenne tomorrow morning -- whether to stay there overnight or not I don't know. Things are a bit in the air right now. Other than a 16-page security policy document that I have to sign and directions to the office, I have zippo about what I'm going to do. Should be fine.
But he said he agreed with the description of David Beamer, whose son Todd
died in the crash, who in a Wall Street Journal commentary last month called it
"our first successful counter-attack in our homeland in this new global war --
World War III".
Bush said: "I believe that. I believe that it was the first counter-attack
to World War III.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will
be fought with sticks and stones. --Albert Einstein
But he said he agreed with the description of David Beamer, whose son Todd
died in the crash, who in a Wall Street Journal commentary last month called it
"our first successful counter-attack in our homeland in this new global war --
World War III".
Bush said: "I believe that. I believe that it was the first counter-attack
to World War III.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will
be fought with sticks and stones. --Albert Einstein
Well, there is apparently no limit to the depth of intellectual dishonesty when it comes to people choosing the primacy of religious belief over science. Some are so desperate for their religious stories to be true that they ignore or wish away all facts to the contrary. Evidence doesn't support your crackpot idea, and in fact supports the science? Don't worry! Just claim that "something else must be happening" -- no need to actually say what that is, or prove your own point. I found this article on NOLA.com, which describes one man's attempt to revive the argument that the heavens revolve around the earth:
Sungenis is a geocentrist. He contends the sun orbits the Earth instead of vice versa. He says physics and the Bible show that the vastness of space revolves around us; that we're at the center of everything, on a planet that does not rotate.
He has just completed a 1,000-page tome, "Galileo Was Wrong," which he hopes will persuade readers to "give Scripture its due place, and show that science is not all it's cracked up to be."
[ . . . ]
If you see the Earth as just a humdrum planet among stars circling in a vast universe, then we're not significant, we're just part of a crowd," Sungenis said. "But if you believe everything revolves around Earth, it gives another picture -- of purpose, a meaning of life."
Let's see if I get this: believe the bible (a book of religious myths intended to help people learn how to live together) that the earth is the center of the universe...because it makes us feel special? If we believe that we're just like anyone else, then it somehow makes us less. How sad.
It's pretty simple: you can have your own opinions, but you don't get to have your own facts. If you have to ignore most of them, and ignore the observable behavior of the world around you...what you are doing is not viable science.
But what about Foucault's famous pendulum? Its plane of oscillation revolves every 24 hours, showing the rotation of the planet. If the Earth didn't rotate, it wouldn't oscillate. Nope, Sungenis said: There just may be some other force propelling it, such as the pull of stars.
"Some other force". Sure. That explains things. People actually believe this drivel?
Furthermore, [...], "The Bible has no part in scientific discussion -- none whatsoever." Or, as Galileo famously quoted 16th century Cardinal Caesar Baronius, "The Bible was written to show us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go."
If you are Christian, the bible is an important part of your life. Good. I hope it makes you a better person. But trying to use it as the one and only science textbook is beyond silly.